<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chipbit ® &#187; vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chipbit.com/category/vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chipbit.com</link>
	<description>A bit of Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 is Slower than Vista</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/windows-7-is-slower-than-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/windows-7-is-slower-than-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/2009/10/windows-7-is-slower-than-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft’s new Windows 7 operating system boots slower than its unloved predecessor, Windows Vista, a PC tune-up developer said today.The claims by iolo Technologies, a Los Angeles maker of PC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Microsoft’s new Windows 7 operating system boots slower than its unloved predecessor, Windows Vista, a PC tune-up developer said today.The claims by iolo Technologies, a Los Angeles maker of PC software, contradict Microsoft’s boasts that Windows 7 starts up faster than Vista. According to iolo’s tests, Windows 7 starts up 42% slower than Vista — one minute, 34 seconds versus one minute, six seconds — on a brand new machine when the time trials are run to the point where the machine is usable, at least by iolo’s standards.</p>
<p align="justify">Windows 7 does seem to start faster than Vista, said iolo, with its time-to-the-desktop measured as around 40 seconds. But iolo measured startup as the point where the computer is “fully usable,” with a low load on the processor.</p>
<p align="justify">Microsoft has said it’s dedicated significant resources to making Windows 7 boot, and resume from sleep and hibernation, faster than Vista, which has been panned since 2007 for starting slowly.</p>
<p align="justify">Other tests, however, have echoed iolo, and showed that in some cases Windows 7 does boot slower than Vista. PC World, a sister publication to Computerworld , for example, benchmarked the new operating system as starting about 10% slower than Vista when 32-bit versions of the two were compared, although it was 14% faster on 64-bit.</p>
<p align="justify">iolo also said its tests indicated that Windows 7’s startup times, like Vista’s, degrade over time. After several “commonly-used” applications have been installed on a new Windows 7 box, for instance, its boot time — again, as measured by the company — slows to two minutes, 34 seconds, an increase of 64%.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Fwindows-7-is-slower-than-vista%2F&amp;title=Windows%207%20is%20Slower%20than%20Vista" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 Windows 7 is Slower than Vista"  title="Windows 7 is Slower than Vista" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/windows-7-is-slower-than-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista Quick Launch Tip</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/windows-vista-quick-launch-tip/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/windows-vista-quick-launch-tip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/2009/09/windows-vista-quick-launch-tip/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has included a small enhancement within Windows Vista pertaining to the Quick Launch icons located on the Task Bar.&#160; This is especially useful for keyboard users who use there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font size="2">Microsoft has included a small enhancement within Windows Vista pertaining to the Quick Launch icons located on the Task Bar.&#160; This is especially useful for keyboard users who use there computer with many different keystrokes, avoiding the mouse as much as possible.&#160; The keystoke combination is effective and easy to manipulate, by pressing and holding the Windows Key (WIN KEY) and tapping a number from one through zero, to launch the appropriate application with simplicity.</font></p>
<p align="justify"><font size="2">In a short amount of time you will master this keystroke saving you the need to take your hands off the keyboard and scrolling with the mouse, making your computing experience all the more easier.</font></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Fwindows-vista-quick-launch-tip%2F&amp;title=Windows%20Vista%20Quick%20Launch%20Tip" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 Windows Vista Quick Launch Tip"  title="Windows Vista Quick Launch Tip" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/windows-vista-quick-launch-tip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweak Windows Vista for Ultimate gaming</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/tweak-windows-vista-for-ultimate-gaming-2/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/tweak-windows-vista-for-ultimate-gaming-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/2009/06/tweak-windows-vista-for-ultimate-gaming-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Vista was heralded by its creators as being a speedy operating system. However, it didn’t take long for users to realise that Vista’s performance was generally no better than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Vista was heralded by its creators as being a speedy operating system. However, it didn’t take long for users to realise that Vista’s performance was generally no better than Windows XP, and in many cases was actually worse. Working with a PC that isn’t performing to its maximum potential can be a frustrating experience, but this is particularly true if the machine is used for gaming. But there are a huge number of tweaks that can be applied to help make working with Vista less exasperating.</p>
<p>Even if you’re working with a high spec rig, the chances are there’s s a great deal that can be done to help improve performance and reduce boot times.</p>
<p>Thankfully, increasing performance need not mean rushing out to the shops to spend hard earned cash on potentially expensive hardware upgrades – or even going so far as buying a whole new setup.</p>
<p>There are a huge number of settings built into Windows which can be adjusted to help speed things up. Some of these are fairly easy to locate – such as in the Control Panel – while others are secreted in hidden dialogs or require editing the registry. Although not every one of the individual tweaks covered here will provide a huge speed boost, used in combination with each other, the overall effect can be very impressive.</p>
<p>There’s no denying that working with Vista can sometimes be frustrating, but with a little time and effort it’s possible to regain control, banish some of the more wasteful features and earn yourself a faster computer into the bargain. Lets get tweaking!</p>
<p>Adjust file indexing</p>
<p>Vista’s file indexing sounds like a good idea in theory: maintaining an index of files contained on the hard drive along with details of their properties to help speed up searching. But in reality searching for files is something that most people do on a very infrequent basis, so it’s wasteful for Windows to spend any time monitoring files when that processor time could be put to much better use.</p>
<p>It’s worth tweaking the settings so that only relevant file types are indexed. Open the Indexing Options Control Panel and click the ‘Modify’ button to choose which folders should be included in the index. Click ‘OK’ followed by ‘Advanced’ and use the ‘File Types’ tab to select which file extensions should be included.</p>
<p>If the feature is not needed, head to the Programs and Features Control Panel and click the ‘Turn Windows features on. Untick the box labelled ‘Indexing Service’ and click ‘OK’ before restarting Windows. File indexing can also be disabled &#8211; more on that later.</p>
<p>Configure page file</p>
<p>Vista generally does a good job of maintaining the page file so it’s the optimum size, and it is a good idea to leave its size with automatic settings. However, if you have more than one hard drive, it’s advisable to move the page file so that it’s located on the fastest drive, and even if only one drive is available, moving it to a separate partition to Windows can help to improve system performance.</p>
<p>Go to Start, right-click ‘Computer’ and select ‘Properties’ before clicking the ‘Advanced system settings’ link to the left of the dialog. On the ‘Advanced’ tab, click the first of the three settings buttons and move to the ‘Advanced’ tab. Click the ‘Change’ button and untick the box labelled ‘Automatically manage paging file size for all drives’ before clicking ‘Set’. Select the entry for the C: drive and then select the ‘No paging file’ option. Now select another drive or partition from the list at the top of the dialog, select the ‘System managed size’ option and click ‘Set’ then ‘Okay’ it.</p>
<p>Most users understand the important of defragmenting hard drives to keep them performing optimally, but the standard defragmentation process does not touch the page file. One way to get around this is to temporarily disable the page file, run the standard defragmentation tool and then recreate the page file.</p>
<p><strong>Cleanup startup</strong></p>
<p>Programs which are configured to run automatically with Windows are something of a double-edged sword. While a program which starts with Windows is immediately available, or may help other apps to start more quickly when they are required, it can also increase boot times and reduce the amount of memory which is available to other programs.</p>
<p>The first place to look for possible candidates for deletion is the Startup group of the Start menu. Expand this submenu and simply right-click a shortcut before deleting it to prevent the associated program from starting the next time Windows boots. This method makes it possible to tame a number of startup programs, but it’s likely that there are many more hiding in the registry.</p>
<p>Launch the Registry Editor by pressing the Windows and R keys simultaneously, type ‘regedit’ and press Enter. Use the Explorer-style tree structure in the left hand pane to navigate to ‘HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run’ and take a look through the list of programs displayed to the right. Take care not to jump in and delete everything that appears here as it is likely that at least a few of the entries are required – such as antivirus software.</p>
<p>Many programs can be easily identified from either their name or the entries path, but if anything is unclear search for the file name online to help determine what its purpose is and whether you can live without it. Now pay a visit to ‘HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run’ to see if there’s anything else that can be deleted.</p>
<p><strong>Disable time stamps</strong></p>
<p>Hard drives that have been formatted as NTFS partition perform better than their FAT 32 counterparts, but there are a couple of features of the format that can hinder performance slightly. Unless a much older operating system needs to access files on the Vista machine, there’s no need for Windows to create 8.3 file names for files.</p>
<p>In a similar vein, the time stamps which are added to files on an NTFA drive, whether they are accessed or not, are little more than a waste of resources for most people. Thankfully, both of these features can be disabled by editing the registry.</p>
<p>Launch the Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\ FileSystem. In the right-hand pane, double-click the key named ‘NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation’ and assign it a value of ‘1?. Do the same for ‘NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate’.</p>
<p>Uninstall remote differential compression</p>
<p>Remote Differential Compression is a feature used in network file synchronisation to help minimise the amount of data that needs to be transferred. It’s not generally a concern on a standard home network.</p>
<p>To uninstall this Vista feature, open the ‘Programs and Features’ Control Panel and click the ‘Turn Windows features on or off’ link. Untick the box next to the entry for Remote Differential Compression and then click ‘OK.’</p>
<p>Disable Aero and transparency effects</p>
<p>Right-click an empty section of the desktop and select ‘Personalize’ before clicking the ‘Theme’ link. By opting to use the old style Classic look of Windows, Aero is disabled helping to speed up general operations.</p>
<p>If you’d prefer to keep the Vista look, but disable Aero effects, click ‘Window Color and Appearance’ and untick the box labelled ‘Enable transparency’.</p>
<p>Boost SATA drive performance</p>
<p>To ensure that SATA hard drives are delivering the best possible performance, open the Device Manager by pressing the Windows and R keys simultaneously, then type ‘devmgmt. msc’ and press Enter.</p>
<p>In the list of hardware devices that’s displayed, double-click the ‘Disk drives’ entry to expand it and then double-click the listing for your hard drive. Move to the ‘Policies’ tab and you should see that ‘Enable write caching on the disk’ is selected by default. By ticking the box<br />
 labelled ‘Enable advanced performance’, drive performance can be increased, but there’s an increased risk of data loss in the event of power failure.</p>
<p>If an external drive – such as a USB drive – is plugged in and is not removed, its performance can be improved by indicating that it will be permanently connected. After selecting the relevant drive from Device Manager, move to the Policies tab and ensure that the ‘Optimize for performance’ option is selected before clicking ‘OK’.</p>
<p>Disable system sounds</p>
<p>It may well seem insignificant, but if Windows plays a sound at startup or to accompany various events, valuable system resources are being wasted. Open the Sound Control Panel and move to the Sounds tab. From the drop down menu select ‘No Sounds’ and indicate whether the current sound scheme should be saved. Also untick the box labelled ‘Play Windows Startup sound’.</p>
<p>Other installed software, such as instant messaging tools, can feature sound effects, so it’s worth looking through the preferences of these programs to disable anything that’s not really needed.</p>
<p>Disable System Restore</p>
<p>System Restore is a useful feature of Windows. It is, however, also a hogger of resources and, providing an alternative manual backup method has been put in place, it can be safely disabled.</p>
<p>Open the System Control Panel and click the ‘System protection’ link to the left of the dialog. On the System Protection tab of System Properties, clear the tick boxes next to each of the listed drives, clicking ‘Turn Off System Restore’ having deselected the drive which contains Windows.</p>
<p><strong>Use ReadyBoost</strong></p>
<p>One of the most effective ways to help boost the performance of Windows is to add extra memory, and while this need not be expensive, there’s an even cheaper option available.</p>
<p>Vista’s ReadyBoost feature makes it possible to use a USB drive – either a thumb drive or a fully fledged external hard drive – to supplement any RAM which is already installed. Although this will not improve performance to the same extent as physical memory, most USB drives used for storage are rarely used to their full capacity and this free space may as well be put to good use.</p>
<p>Plug in a USB drive and an autoplay window should appear &#8211; select the option labelled ‘Speed up my computer’. If this dialog is not displayed simply open up Computer, right-click the relevant drive and select Properties before moving to the ‘ReadyBoost’ tab. Ensure that the ‘Use this device’ option is selected and use the slider to indicate how much of the disk storage space should be given offer to ReadyBoost.</p>
<p><strong>Disable UAC</strong></p>
<p>User Account Control has proved to be one of Vista’s least popular features by a long chalk. The handholding security warnings that get displayed when performing a range of common tasks serve only to irritate most computer users but the good news is that they can be banished in a variety of ways.</p>
<p>UAC can be disabled via the Control Panel, by editing the registry or by adjusting Group Policy settings, but the quickest and easiest option is to use MSConfig. Press the Windows + R keys , type ‘msconfig’ and press Enter. Move to the ‘Tools’ tab and select the entry labelled ‘Disable UAC’. Click the ‘Launch’ button and a Command Prompt window will appear – simply close this down when the operation is complete and then restart Windows to save the new setting.</p>
<p>If you need to, UAC can be quickly re-enabled by repeating these steps, but this time select the ‘Enable UAC’ option within MSConfig.</p>
<p><strong>Disable special effects</strong></p>
<p>Even with the more simplistic look in place, Vista still uses a range of special effects in an attempt to make the Desktop look better. Click ‘Window Color and Appearance’ followed by the ‘Effects’ button and then untick all three boxes that are displayed.</p>
<p>To disable some or all of these effects, press the Windows and Pause/Break keys simultaneously and click ‘Advanced system settings’ to the left. On the ‘Advanced’ tab, click the first of the three Settings buttons and disable any of the effects that you don’t want to use before clicking ‘OK’.</p>
<p><strong>Tweak SuperFetch</strong></p>
<p>There’s certainly some controversy surrounding the idea that disabling Vista’s SuperFetch feature actually helps to improve performance – to a large extent it will really depend a great deal on how you use your computer.</p>
<p>Launch the Registry Editor and pay a visit to ‘HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management\ PrefetchParameters’. In the right-hand of the pane, locate the key named ‘EnablePrefetcher’ and double-click it. You’ll find that its default value will be ‘3?. What this does is automatically cache both application data and boot files. If you change this value to ‘2? this will ensure that only boot files are cached. However, changing its setting to ‘1? will cache only application data, and setting it to ‘0? will disable caching altogether.</p>
<p>SuperFetch can also be disabled using the Services console &#8211; take a look at the ‘Disabling services’ box out for more details. It is also worth clearing out the contents of ‘C:\ Windows\Prefetch’ from time to time, to force Windows to rebuild the cache from scratch.</p>
<p><strong>Disable disk space checking</strong></p>
<p>Two reasonably pointless features that are found in Vista involve the annoying display of balloon tips and checks to ensure that you’re not running out of hard drive space.</p>
<p>Disabling both of these features may not make a massive difference to performance, but in conjunction with other minor tweaks, every little boost will help leach back resources. Launch the Registry Editor and navigate to ‘HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Explorer’ before clicking ‘Edit’ &gt; ‘New’ &gt; ‘DWORD (32-Bit) Value’. Name the new item ‘NoLowDiskSpaceChecks’ and then double-click it before assigning it a value of ‘1?.</p>
<p>Now you’ll need to navigate to ‘HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced’ and look for three DWORD values called ‘EnableBalloonTips’, ‘FolderContentsInfoTip’ and ‘StartButtonBalloonTip’, creating them if they do not already exist. Doubleclick each value in turn and assign each of them a value of ‘0?.</p>
<p><strong>Disabling hardware</strong></p>
<p>In the days of Windows XP, it was possible to create hardware profiles which could be used for different purposes.</p>
<p>For general computing a profile where available hardware devices were enabled was ideal, while when it came to gaming, a profile which only loaded the drivers for hardware which was essential was better suited.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, hardware profiles were dropped from Vista and there isn’t any proper alternative. That said, it’s still worth checking that all of the hardware you have installed is essential, and if there’s anything which isn’t used very often, or indeed at all, it can be unplugged and uninstalled via the Device Manager.</p>
<p>Non-essential hardware can also be disabled on a temporary basis to free up as many system resources as possible, again using Device Manager. Press Windows + Pause /Break, click the ‘Device Manager’ link and expand the tree structure to display all the currently installed hardware. Right-click an item to be disabled and select ‘Disable’, reversing this process when the device is needed again.</p>
<p><strong>Maintain your HDD</strong></p>
<p>It’s an obvious point, but if you want to ensure maximum performance at all times, it’s important to take care of your hard drive. Unnecessary files and programs are a waste of space and can lead to a drive that runs inefficiently when the process of tidying up your hard drive can be automated to some degree.</p>
<p>Click the ‘Start’ orb and then click ‘All Programs’ &gt; ??<br />
?Accessories’ &gt; ‘System Tools’ &gt; ‘Disk Cleanup’. Choose a drive from the drop down menu and click ‘OK’ to perform a scan. From the list that’s displayed, select any of the types of file, which should be deleted and click ‘OK’ to start a clear out.</p>
<p>Additional space can be freed up by moving to the ‘More Options’ tab and using the two buttons to remove unwanted software and unnecessary System Restore points. Having deleted a large amount of unwanted data, defragmentation is important to help better organise the files on your drive. Launch Disk Defragmenter from the System Tools section of the Start menu and click ‘Defragment’ now to start the optimisation process.</p>
<p>As with all previous versions of Windows, the Vista OS is ripe for a right good tweaking, and spending a little time customising operating system settings can pay noticeable dividends, helping to dramatically improve system performance.</p>
<p>The time spent adjusting settings is, frankly, a small price to pay for squeezing a bit more power from your rig, and it’s certainly a cheaper option than heading out and buying a new system or <strong>hardware upgrades.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Using tweaking tools</strong></p>
<p>In the days of Windows 9x, Me and XP, Microsoft programmers produced a fantastically useful tweaking tool in the form of TweakUI. Unfortunately, there’s no Vista version of this tool available, but plenty of alternatives have been developed by third parties.</p>
<p>One such program is TweakVI. The program is available in three versions – Ultimate, Premium and Free. For basic, essential tweaking, the Free version is sufficient, so download the setup file and start the installation.</p>
<p>Installing TweakVI is a fairly standard affair, but there are few caveats to watch out for. When asked to register the software, enter your name as ‘SKIP’ to avoid having to disclose your email address.</p>
<p>After taking up the opportunity to create a Restore Point, indicate that a copy of EasyBCD is not required and the installation will continue. When complete, launch the program and click the ‘Start the freeware version’ button and work through the various options. By default, TweakVI displays option which cannot actually be used in the free version of the program, but these options can be hidden.</p>
<p>Another free tweaking tool worthy of mention is the Ultimate Windows Tweaker. After extraction, the program doesn’t require installation and can be copied to a USB drive so it can be used on other computers.</p>
<p>One of the most basic tweaks available is to speed up the display of menus – achieved by moving the slider in the first section of the program – but this can make a dramatic improvement to the usability of Windows. Many of the tweaks mentioned in this feature can be enabled through the Ultimate Windows Tweaker, and this is a good option if you don’t feel happy editing the registry.</p>
<p><strong>Disable services</strong></p>
<p>You can speed up Vista by disabling unnecessary Services. These are components of Windows, which can run automatically in the background without the need for user intervention. Some Services control essential components such as networking, but there are a huge number which are entirely unnecessary.</p>
<p>To start taking control, press Windows + R simultaneously, type ’services.msc’ and press [Enter] to access the Services console. A large number of services will be displayed by default, and the list may be larger on some systems depending on the software that’s installed.</p>
<p>Just which services can be safely disabled will vary greatly from one machine to another, and is largely dependent on what it’s used for. For a comprehensive list of all of Vista’s services including advice about whether they should be disabled and details of their role to help with decision making, take a look at the Black Viper Service Guide.</p>
<p>For starters, here is a list of services that can be safely disabled on the vast majority of computers; DFS Replication, Diagnostic Policy Service, Distributed Link Tracking Client, IKE and AuthIP IPsec Keying Modules, IPsec Policy Agent, KtmRm for Distributed Transaction Coordinator, Offl ine Files, Remote Registry, Secondary Logon, Security Center, SSDP Discovery, Tablet PC Input Service, Terminal Services, Windows Defender, Windows Error Reporting Service and Windows Search.</p>
<p>To disable an individual service, locate it in the list and then double-click it. On the dialog that’s displayed, click the ‘Stop’ button to terminate the service, and then select ‘Disabled’ from the ‘Startup type’ drop down menu. Click ‘OK’ and start to work through any other services you have determined you don’t need.</p>
<p>Just as with registry editing, changing service settings is potentially dangerous, so it’s a good idea to create a restore point before applying any tweaks.</p>
<p><strong>Edit and back up the reg</strong></p>
<p>Make sure you safeguard your settings in case the worst happens, but remember providing care is taken to work with the correct keys and no spelling mistakes are made, editing the registry should be fairly safe. This huge database is so central to Vista that if anything goes wrong it can have some very devastating consequences. Beware!</p>
<p>In the main text of this feature we have recommended that System Restore be disabled to free up system resources, but this tool can be used to create a backup of the registry which can then be easily restored if necessary. Before undertaking any registry editing, temporarily re-enable System Restore by reversing the steps above and then click Start &gt; All Programs &gt; Accessories &gt; System Tools &gt; System Restore. Click the ‘Open system protection’ link at the bottom of the dialog and then click the ‘Create’ button. Enter a suitable name for the restore point and click ‘Create’ before waiting for the process to complete.</p>
<p>When editing the registry, it’s advisable to apply one tweak at a time, as this means that if something goes wrong, identifying the culprit is much easier. Should a registry backup ever be needed, launch System Restore using the method outlined previously, but this time select the option labelled ‘Choose a different restore point’ before clicking ‘Next’. From the list that’s displayed, select the required restore point and click ‘Next’ and then finish off.</p>
<p>If a session of registry editing results in an unbootable system, it is still possible to make use of System Restore in Safe Mode. Restart your computer and tap the F8 key during the boot process. From the menu that is displayed, use the cursor keys to highlight the ‘Safe Mode with Networking’ option and press Enter. Choose a restore point to use, as described before, and then restart Windows in the usual fashion.Source: <a href="http://www.techradar.com">techradar</a></p>
<p><font color="#0000a0" size="5">Check Out Ads for more tweaks</font></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Ftweak-windows-vista-for-ultimate-gaming-2%2F&amp;title=Tweak%20Windows%20Vista%20for%20Ultimate%20gaming" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 Tweak Windows Vista for Ultimate gaming"  title="Tweak Windows Vista for Ultimate gaming" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/tweak-windows-vista-for-ultimate-gaming-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five quick Windows Vista speedup tips</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/five-quick-windows-vista-speedup-tips/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/five-quick-windows-vista-speedup-tips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/2009/05/five-quick-windows-vista-speedup-tips/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I split my work time about evenly between Windows XP and Vista. Let me tell you, I’ll take Vista 99 days out of 100. Vista’s safer than XP, it looks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I split my work time about evenly between Windows XP and Vista. Let me tell you, I’ll take Vista 99 days out of 100. Vista’s safer than XP, it looks better than its predecessor, and it runs at least as fast as XP. Performance has been a knock on Vista since the operating system was released, but there are some relatively simple ways to give Vista a little goose so it performs some common operations a tad faster. These five tips should shorten your workday:</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Put an encrypt/decrypt option on your context menu</strong></p>
<p>If you frequently encrypt files or folders to protect your privacy, you can access this function via the right-click menu by changing a Registry key. Editing the Registry is always risky, so back it up first by creating a restore point. To do so, press the Windows key, type systempropertiesprotection.exe, and press Enter. Click Create, give the restore point a name, and choose Create again.</p>
<p>With your Registry backup in place, press the Windows key, type regedit, and press enter. Navigate to and select this key:</p>
<p>HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced</p>
<p>Right-click in the right pane, choose New &gt; DWORD (32-bit) Value, and name it EncryptionContextMenu. Double-click the new entry, give it a value of 1, and click OK. After you restart your system, you’ll see an Encrypt/Decrypt option when you right-click a file or folder.</p>
<p><strong>Disable DOS-era 8.3 file-name compatibility</strong></p>
<p>Most hard drives on Vista systems are partitioned using NTFS rather than the older FAT32 format. But Vista still supports the old 8.3 file-name convention of DOS and early versions of Windows. This is handy if you still run DOS-era 16-bit programs, but most of us have no need to retain this backward-compatibility. You can speed up your file accesses a bit by disabling this feature.</p>
<p>To do so, open the Registry Editor as described in the previous tip and navigate to and select this key:</p>
<p>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem</p>
<p>Double-click the key named NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation, change its value from 0 to 1, and click OK.</p>
<p>Do without last-access file updating</p>
<p>Whenever you open a file on an NTFS partition, it gets a date stamp that’s separate from its “last modified on” date and time. If you can do without this information, you can disable it and open your files a skosh faster.</p>
<p>Start by opening the Registry Editor as described above. Navigate to and select this key:</p>
<p>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem</p>
<p>Double-click NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate, change the DWORD value from 0 to 1, and click OK.</p>
<p>Windows Vista Registry Editor</p>
<p>Change this Registry key to disable the last-file-access feature to open files faster.</p>
<p><strong>Access Vista’s report on your start-up and shutdown speeds</strong></p>
<p>Among the interesting performance-measuring tools in Vista is the Event Viewer’s log of your system’s start-up and shutdown performance. To view these reports, press the Windows key, type event, and press Enter. Navigate in the left pane to this entry:</p>
<p>Applications and Service Log\Microsoft\Windows\Diagnostics-Performance</p>
<p>Double-click Operational in the middle pane to view the most recent events. Look for entries numbered from 100 to 199 to indicate start-up items, and ones numbered from 200 to 299 for shutdown items. Click the Details tab below the event log and make sure Friendly View is selected.</p>
<p><strong>Windows Vista Event Viewer</strong></p>
<p>Vista’s Event Viewer records your boot times and other performance information about your start-ups and shutdowns.</p>
<p>You’ll see the boot and shutdown times in milliseconds and other information about your start-ups and shutdowns. Compare the numbers for each system start and shutdown to determine whether your machine’s slowing down. If it is, try paring your list of start-up applications using the tips in this post from last October. And use the tips in this post from March 2008 to put Windows to bed in a jiffy.</p>
<p><strong>Let Vista tell you how it’s doing</strong></p>
<p>A little-known addition to Vista is the System Health Report Generator, which gives you an inside look at how well your PC is running. To access the tool, press the Windows key, type perform info, and press Enter. Click Advanced tools in the left pane and choose Generate a system health report.</p>
<p>About a minute later, you’ll see the test results in various categories. For help deciphering the information and on using other components of the Performance and Reliability Monitor, check out this guide on Microsoft’s TechNet site.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://news.cnet.com/" target="_blank">cnet</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Ffive-quick-windows-vista-speedup-tips%2F&amp;title=Five%20quick%20Windows%20Vista%20speedup%20tips" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 Five quick Windows Vista speedup tips"  title="Five quick Windows Vista speedup tips" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/five-quick-windows-vista-speedup-tips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft’s biggest blunder: Vista or Wind</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/microsoft%e2%80%99s-biggest-blunder-vista-or-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/microsoft%e2%80%99s-biggest-blunder-vista-or-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the news that Microsoft is recommending that some companies should abandon Vista deployment plans and move instead full-bore into Windows 7, Microsoft is beginning to close the chapter on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the news that Microsoft is recommending that some companies should abandon Vista deployment plans and move instead full-bore into Windows 7, Microsoft is beginning to close the chapter on Vista, one that the company would rather forget. But Vista wasn’t the company’s biggest blunder — Windows Me was far worse.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Vista is slower than XP, and when it launched, it had too many hardware woes. But it was also a major step ahead for Windows. The Windows interface got a much-needed facelift, plenty of new useful features were added, such as the Network Center and Network Map, and Aero added some nice eye candy. I’ll admit it: I’m a fan of Vista, and I think it’s been unnecessarily reviled.</p>
<p>Windows Me, on the other hand, was bad in just about every way. Start off with the name. It was officially named Windows Millenium Edition, which sounds like a bad, knock-off science fiction movie with cheesy special effects…and come to think of it, that’s not a bad description of the operating system, either. Windows Me was full of bugs, slow, and unstable. People had trouble getting it to start, getting it to stop, and handling it while it was running.</p>
<p>The operating system was a follow-on to Windows 98 SE (Special Edition), and had no reason for being other than that Microsoft figured it better get something out the door in time for the year 2000. Some people, in fact, referred to it as the true Y2K bug.</p>
<p>So as we bid Windows Vista good-bye between now and October, keep in mind that no matter the complaints you might have had about it, there was a Windows-based operating system that was far worse.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/" target="_blank">computerworld</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Fmicrosoft%25e2%2580%2599s-biggest-blunder-vista-or-wind%2F&amp;title=Microsoft%E2%80%99s%20biggest%20blunder%3A%20Vista%20or%20Wind" id="wpa2a_10"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 Microsoft’s biggest blunder: Vista or Wind"  title="Microsoft’s biggest blunder: Vista or Wind" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/microsoft%e2%80%99s-biggest-blunder-vista-or-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista and Windows 7 more secure than Linux and Mac OS X</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/vista-and-windows-7-more-secure-than-linux-and-mac-os-x/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/vista-and-windows-7-more-secure-than-linux-and-mac-os-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/2009/04/vista-and-windows-7-more-secure-than-linux-and-mac-os-x/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Operating system security is always a hotly contended subject, and last week Microsoft amped up the hype by claiming that Windows Vista and the soon-to-be-released 7 is the world’s most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Operating system security is always a hotly contended subject, and last week Microsoft amped up the hype by claiming that Windows Vista and the soon-to-be-released 7 is the world’s most secure OS, beating both Linux and Mac OS X.</p>
<p align="justify">Here’s what Microsoft’s chief operating officer Kevin Turner had to say at the MidMarket CIO Summit last week:</p>
<p align="justify">Vista today, post-Service Pack 2, which is now in the marketplace, is the safest, most reliable OS we’ve ever built. It’s also the most secure OS on the planet, including Linux and open source and Apple Leopard. It’s the safest and most secure OS on the planet today. Everything that we’ve learned in Vista will be leveraged in Windows 7, but certainly when we broke a lot of the compatibility issues to lock down user account controls, to lock down the ability to manipulate states and all the things, that was a very painful process for us to grow through, but we had to do it. And the reason that Windows 7 will be successful is because of the pain we took on Vista. Because from a compatibility standpoint, if it works on Vista, it will work on Windows 7. If it doesn’t work on Vista, it won’t work on Windows 7.</p>
<p align="justify">Source: <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com">zdnet</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Fvista-and-windows-7-more-secure-than-linux-and-mac-os-x%2F&amp;title=Vista%20and%20Windows%207%20more%20secure%20than%20Linux%20and%20Mac%20OS%20X" id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 Vista and Windows 7 more secure than Linux and Mac OS X"  title="Vista and Windows 7 more secure than Linux and Mac OS X" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/vista-and-windows-7-more-secure-than-linux-and-mac-os-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>View Vista Hidden Files and Folders</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/view-vista-hidden-files-and-folders/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/view-vista-hidden-files-and-folders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/2009/03/view-vista-hidden-files-and-folders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By default, Windows “hides” various files and folders that are essential to system operation and data integrity. Why the Big Brother tactic? To protect you from yourself: moving or deleting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By default, Windows “hides” various files and folders that are essential to system operation and data integrity. Why the Big Brother tactic? To protect you from yourself: moving or deleting any of these items could have unwelcome consequences.</p>
<p>Of course, power users sometimes need access to hidden files and folders, like I did the other day when I went searching for an Outlook PST file. In the old XP days, I knew right where to find the setting that would reveal the concealed stuff, but in Vista, the setting for hidden files and folders is hidden itself!</p>
<p>Well, okay, not hidden, just relocated. Here’s how to find it:</p>
<p>1. Open the Control Panel.    <br />ad_icon</p>
<p>2. In the Search field, type folder.</p>
<p>3. You’ll see a section called Folder Options. Under that, click Show hidden files and folders.</p>
<p>4. Find a tick the option marked Show hidden files and folders.</p>
<p>5. Click OK.</p>
<p>That’s all there is to it. A word of caution, though: Leaving this option enabled is not a good idea, even for power users. My recommendation: After you’ve found the hidden files and/or folders you need, head back to Control Panel and re-enable Do not show hidden files and folders.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com">washingtonpost</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Fview-vista-hidden-files-and-folders%2F&amp;title=View%20Vista%20Hidden%20Files%20and%20Folders" id="wpa2a_14"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 View Vista Hidden Files and Folders"  title="View Vista Hidden Files and Folders" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/view-vista-hidden-files-and-folders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 &#8220;should do a lot better&#8221; than Vista</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/windows-7-should-do-a-lot-better-than-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/windows-7-should-do-a-lot-better-than-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/2009/03/windows-7-should-do-a-lot-better-than-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the positive reaction to the Windows 7 beta coming from various places in the media, many have started to wonder how well Windows 7 will fare once it ships. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the positive reaction to the Windows 7 beta coming from various places in the media, many have started to wonder how well Windows 7 will fare once it ships. While it’s still too early to know for sure, certain well-known groups have already made a point to voice their opinion about what will happen next. For example, a while back, I asked Michael Silver, Research VP of Gartner, how he expected to Windows 7 to perform compared to Windows Vista in both the consumer and business markets.</p>
<p>“It should do a lot better,” he told Ars. “Vista has such a bad reputation that it would be hard for Windows 7 not to do better, though Vista’s reputation is a lot worse than the product. Vista adoption is especially low in business—ISVs will eventually look to reduce or drop support for new applications on Windows XP and that will help push organizations to Windows 7 more quickly. Still it will take organizations 12-18 months from the time Windows 7 ships until they are ready to deploy it in large numbers, meaning broad adoption for enterprise begins in 1H11.”</p>
<p>Two weeks ago, Silver released a report titled Windows 7 Won’t Need SP1, but Will Still Need 12 to 18 Months Before Deployment Begins in which he dived deeper into what business users should expect. The most interesting conclusion he came to was “Don’t use SP1 as a milestone to deploy a new version of Windows, but plan to deploy SP1 as part of the initial deployment,” an obvious attempt to destroy the rule of thumb of “wait till SP1 for any new release of Windows.” That would have made Microsoft happy, but Silver still recommends waiting at least a year. Expect Redmond to be giving a completely different recommendation to businesses in the coming months.</p>
<hr align="left" size="1" width="100%" />Source: <a href="http://arstechnica.com">arstechnica</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Fwindows-7-should-do-a-lot-better-than-vista%2F&amp;title=Windows%207%20%26%238220%3Bshould%20do%20a%20lot%20better%26%238221%3B%20than%20Vista" id="wpa2a_16"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 Windows 7 &#8220;should do a lot better&#8221; than Vista"  title="Windows 7 &#8220;should do a lot better&#8221; than Vista" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/windows-7-should-do-a-lot-better-than-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adding Windows 7-Style Icons to Vista</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/adding-windows-7-style-icons-to-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/adding-windows-7-style-icons-to-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/2009/02/adding-windows-7-style-icons-to-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As most Windows watchers know by now, Windows 7 brings a handful of interface tweaks to the table, starting with large, eye-pleasing program icons that take up residence in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As most Windows watchers know by now, Windows 7 brings a handful of interface tweaks to the table, starting with large, eye-pleasing program icons that take up residence in the taskbar. Of course, this is little more than an update to the Quick Launch feature that debuted in Windows XP. And believe it or not, Vista users can easily bring that Windows 7 look to their own taskbars.</p>
<p>Here’s how:</p>
<p>1. Right-click any open space in the taskbar and clear the checkmark from <em>Lock the Taskbar</em>.</p>
<p>2. Right-click the taskbar again and choose <em>Toolbars, Quick Launch</em>. A small batch of icons appears next to the Start button.</p>
<p>3. Click and drag the Quick Launch toolbar’s right handle to the right to create some extra icon space.</p>
<p>4. Right-click in an open space within that toolbar, then choose <em>View, Large Icons</em>.</p>
<p>Presto! Now your Vista taskbar should look a lot like Windows 7’s. To add icons, just drag and drop any program, folder, or individual file to the Quick Launch toolbar.</p>
<p>I’ll admit I’m not so ga-ga over Windows 7’s interface changes as some folks, but as a longtime Quick Launch fan, I’m definitely liking these larger icons.</p>
<p> Source: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com">washingtonpost</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Fadding-windows-7-style-icons-to-vista%2F&amp;title=Adding%20Windows%207-Style%20Icons%20to%20Vista" id="wpa2a_18"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 Adding Windows 7 Style Icons to Vista"  title="Adding Windows 7 Style Icons to Vista" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/adding-windows-7-style-icons-to-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gamers, enterprises saying yes to Windows Vista</title>
		<link>http://chipbit.com/gamers-enterprises-saying-yes-to-windows-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://chipbit.com/gamers-enterprises-saying-yes-to-windows-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fazle321</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipbit.com/2009/02/gamers-enterprises-saying-yes-to-windows-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet’s chattering classes may have already given up on Windows Vista, but two key segments of the PC population apparently haven’t.More than a third of online gamers are running [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Internet’s chattering classes may have already given up on Windows Vista, but two key segments of the PC population apparently haven’t.More than a third of online gamers are running Windows Vista, according to a January survey (scroll down to “Windows version”) by online gaming company Valve Corp. That’s almost double the 18% of the nearly 2 million online gamers surveyed by Valve last August.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, almost one third of North American and European corporations have started deploying Vista, according to a report released late last week by Forrester Research.</p>
<p>While Vista has been bashed repeatedly, IT managers are actually “slowly warming” to the operating system two years after its release, wrote analyst Ben Gray.</p>
<p>Nearly 10% of enterprise PCs were running Vista in August and September, when Forrester interviewed 962 IT decision makers at North American and European companies.</p>
<p>Despite “considerable interest in Windows 7,” Gray wrote, Windows Vista is finally shaping out to be the operating system that dethrones Windows XP.”</p>
<p>XP still dominates, with a 71% share, but that is down 16% from its 87% share of corporate desktops in Forrester’s survey results in the three months earlier.</p>
<p>XP is a “lame-duck operating system,” Gray wrote.</p>
<p>Similarly, XP is still run by 65% of players at Steam, an online site for PC gaming that requires users to run Windows 2000, XP or Vista. But 34% were running Vista, which offers more advanced graphics-rendering capabilities desired by gamers.</p>
<p>Those running the 32-bit version of Vista outnumbered users of the more advanced 64-bit flavor by a ratio of three to one — an indicator of how representative of the overall consumer population Steam’s sample is.</p>
<p>Besides the 30% of IT managers who told Forrester last fall they were already deploying Vista, another 27% said they planned to deploy Vista this year or in 2010.</p>
<p>In the Forrester report, Gray did not address the impact of the recent economic downturn and reports late last year that corporations would cut back on their 2009 IT spending plans.</p>
<p>Fifteen percent of respondents told Forrester last fall they planned to skip Vista for Windows 7, with another 28% reporting “no plans” or “don’t know.”</p>
<p>Despite increasing hints that Windows 7 may ship by this Christmas, Gray continues to peg its release for early 2010. As such, he advises companies worried about Microsoft cutting mainstream support for XP after April to upgrade to Vista now.</p>
<p>“Windows 7 will not be dramatically different from Windows Vista since it’s built on the same code base to ensure greater application and hardware compatibility &#8211; rather it’s an evolutionary update with more user-facing enhancements,” he wrote. “The bottom line is if you are going to skip Windows Vista on some or all of your PCs, you will need to move very quickly to deploy Windows 7, particularly if you wait until Service Pack 1, as most enterprises do.”</p>
<p>Mac OS X had a 3% share of corporate PCs, while Linux had 2%. Gray expects Apple’s operating system to “maintain its niche business status,” though “progressive organizations are flirting with desktop and application virtualization” to enable Mac usage, “and some are even experimenting with ‘bring your own PC to work’ programs” that also allow Macs, he wrote.</p>
<p> Source: <a href="http://www.computerworld.com">computerworld</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fchipbit.com%2Fgamers-enterprises-saying-yes-to-windows-vista%2F&amp;title=Gamers%2C%20enterprises%20saying%20yes%20to%20Windows%20Vista" id="wpa2a_20"><img src="http://chipbit.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_256_24.png" width="256" height="24" alt="share save 256 24 Gamers, enterprises saying yes to Windows Vista"  title="Gamers, enterprises saying yes to Windows Vista" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chipbit.com/gamers-enterprises-saying-yes-to-windows-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

